A Betting
2021年3月18日Register here: http://gg.gg/opv75
Sep 04, 2014 Common futures bets include betting a team to win a championship at the outset of a season, or betting whether the team will win or lose more games than a set line at the start of the season. Abet definition, to encourage, support, or countenance by aid or approval, usually in wrongdoing: to abet a swindler; to abet a crime. Abet (ə-bĕt′) tr.v. Abetted, abetting, abets 1. To approve, encourage, and support (an action or a plan of action); urge and help on. To urge, encourage, or help (a person): abetted the thief in robbing the. Jul 15, 2020 How to Bet on Sports for Beginners: 12 Tips to Know 1. Underdogs When the oddsmakers release a betting line on a game, the first thing they do is decide which. Spreads There are two main ways to bet on a favorite or an underdog. The first is the point spread, which is a bet on. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.
In the world of sports betting, a money line bet is simply betting on which team you expect to win. It doesn’t have anything to do with a spread. You may also see a money line bet listed as “Money Line” or “ML” in different spaces.
Money lines are represented in negative and positive values.Negative money line: -145, -220, or anything similar
When you see a minus (-) sign in front of a price, it shows you that team is the favorite to win the game.
That number also indicates how much money you need to bet/spend in order to win $100.
For example, a -220 money line means you need to bet $220 in order to win $100 provided the team you bet on actually does win.
Heavy favorites are known in sports betting as a “chalk” pick. A heavy favorite usually has a number pushing +300 or more. Here, you’re wagering a lot on the favorite to win a little. Don’t assume that a heavy favorite, or chalk pick, is a guaranteed winner…Positive money line: +145, +220, or anything similar
When you see a plus (+) sign in front of a price, it shows you that team is the underdog. Higher numbers like +400, +500, +5000, etc. represent how much of an underdog the team is in the game. The higher the number the more likely the team is expected to lose in the eyes of the oddsmakers.
The number also indicates how much money would win in comparison to every $100 you wager.If I Were A Betting Man
For example, a +150 money line means you would win $150 for each $100 wager you place should that team win the game.Money line examples:
Lets use an NFL example here:
New England Patriots -240
Miami Dolphins +220
To bet the New England Patriots to win on the money line, you would need to spend $240 on the bet for a chance to win $100 if the Patriots beat the Dolphins. Your return would be $340 – the original $240 stake (bet) and the $100 bet profit.
To bet the Miami Dolphins to win on the money line, you would spend $100 on the bet for a chance to win $220 if the Dolphins, as the underdog, beat the Patriots. Your return would be $320 – the original $100 stake (bet) and the $220 profit.
In both situations, it doesn’t matter if the team you bet on wins by one point or 100 points. You’re purely betting on the team you believe will win the game. As Al Davis said, “Just win, baby.” That’s exactly what you’d be looking for out of your selection. It doesn’t have to be pretty, it just has to happen or your original stake is lost.
Aiding and abetting is a legal doctrine related to the guilt of someone who aids or abets (encourages, incites) another person in the commission of a crime (or in another’s suicide). It exists in a number of different countries and generally allows a court to pronounce someone guilty for aiding and abetting in a crime even if they are not the principal offender.Canada[edit]
In Canada, a person who aids or abets in the commission of a crime is treated the same as a principal offender under the criminal law. Section 21(1) of the Criminal Code provides that:Every one is a party to an offence who(a) actually commits it;(b) does or omits to do anything for the purpose of aiding any person to commit it; or(c) abets any person in committing it.[1]A Betting Person
To show that an accused aided or abetted in the commission of a crime, the Crown does not need to prove the guilt of a specific principal offender.
The Crown must show something more than mere presence to prove the act of aiding or abetting. Presence in the commission of a crime might be evidence of aiding and abetting if the accused had prior knowledge of the crime, or if the accused had legal duty or control over the principal offender. For example, the owner of a car who lets another person drive dangerously without taking steps to prevent it may be guilty because of their control over the driver’s use of the vehicle.[2]
Further, the Crown must show that the accused had prior knowledge that ’an offence of the type committed was planned’, but it is not necessary that the accused desired the result or had the motive of assisting the crime. Intention to assist the crime is sufficient.[3]United States[edit]Criminal[edit]
Aiding and abetting is an additional provision in United Statescriminal law, for situations where it cannot be shown the party personally carried out the criminal offense, but where another person may have carried out the illegal act(s) as an agent of the charged, working together with or under the direction of the charged, who is an accessory to the crime. It is comparable to laws in some other countries governing the actions of accessories, including the similar provision in England and Wales under the Accessories and Abettors Act 1861.A Betting Woman
It is derived from the United States Code (U.S.C.), section two of title 18:
(a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal.(b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal.
The scope of this federal statute for aiders and abettors ’is incredibly broad—it can be implied in every charge for a federalsubstantive offense.’ [4] Where the term ’principal’ refers to any actor who is primarily responsible for a criminal offense.
For a successful prosecution, the provision of ’aiding and abetting’ must be considered alongside the crime itself, although a defendant can be found guilty of aiding and abetting an offense even if the principal is found not guilty of the crime itself. In all cases of aiding and abetting, it must be shown a crime has been committed, but not necessarily who committed it.[5] It is necessary to show that the defendant has wilfully associated himself with the crime being committed, that he does, through his own act or omission, as he would do if he wished for a criminal venture to succeed.[6] Under this statute, anyone who aids or abets a crime may be charged directly with the crime, as if the charged had carried out the act himself.[7] This is distinct from the concept of being an accessory after the fact, a charge distinct from being a principal.A Betting System CrosswordHistory[edit]
The first United States statute dealing with accessory liability was passed in 1790, and made criminally liable those who should aid and assist, procure, command, counsel or advise murder or robbery on land or sea, or piracy at sea. This was broadened in 1870 to include any felony, and by it an accessory was anyone who counsels, advises or procures the crime. These early statutes were repealed in 1909, and supplanted by 18 U.S.C. § 550, a statute which included the modern language of ’Whoever aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces, or procures the commission of an offense is a principal.’[8]Start A Betting Site
In 1948, § 550 became 18 U.S.C. § 2(a). Section 2(b) was also added to make clear the legislative intent to punish as a principal not only one who directly commits an offense and one who ’aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures’ another to commit an offense, but also anyone who causes the doing of an act which if done by him directly would render him guilty of an offense against the United States. It removes all doubt that one who puts in motion or assists in the illegal enterprise or causes the commission of an indispensable element of the offense by an innocent agent or instrumentality is guilty as a principal even though he intentionally refrained from the direct act constituting the completed offense.[9]
Subsection (a) of Section 2 was amended to its current form in 1951 to read, ’Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal.’ Subsection (b) was also amended in 1951 to add ’wilfully’ and ’is punishable as a principal.’[10]Application to ’white collar crimes’[edit]
Since 2001, the Securities and Exchange Commission has filed a number of complaints related to the aiding and abetting of securities fraud. For example, CIBC and Merrill Lynch were separately charged with aiding and abetting Enron’s evasion of record keeping requirements and required financial controls. Settlements, including disgorgement, penalties, and interest reached $80 million in both cases.Civil[edit]
Aiding and abetting is also a legal theory of civil accessory liability. To prove accessory liability through ’aiding and abetting,’ the plaintiffs must prove three elements:
*That Defendant B breached a duty to Plaintiff, the result of which injured Plaintiff;
*That Defendant A knowingly and substantially assisted Defendant B in breaching the duty; and
*That Defendant A was aware of its role in promoting the breach of duty at the time it provided assistance.[11]United Kingdom[edit]
The Accessories and Abettors Act 1861 provides that an accessory to an indictable offence shall be treated in the same way as if he had actually committed the offence himself. Section 8 of the Act, as amended, reads:
Whosoever shall aid, abet, counsel, or procure the commission of any indictable offence, whether the same be an offence at common law or by virtue of any Act passed or to be passed, shall be liable to be tried, indicted, and punished as a principal offender.
Section 10 states that the Act does not apply to Scotland. The rest of the Act was repealed by the Criminal Law Act 1967 as a consequence of the abolition of the distinction between felonies and misdemeanours.See also[edit]Reading A Betting LineLook up aid and abet in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.References[edit]A Betting Man Is A Meme
*^Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c C-46, s 21.
*^R. v. Kulbacki, [1966] 1 CCC 167 (Man CA)
*^R. v. Hibbert, [1995] 2 SCR 973
*^Benton Martin, Jeremiah Newhall, Technology and the Guilty Mind: When Do Technology Providers Become Criminal Accomplices?
*^Stephanie Wickouski (2007). Bankruptcy Crimes Third Edition. p. 95. ISBN978-1-58798-272-9.
*^American Bar Association Antitrust Section (1982). Jury instructions in criminal antitrust cases. p. 27. ISBN9780897070546.
*^’United States v. Hodorowicz – 105 F.2d 218 (1939)’. US Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. June 13, 1939. Retrieved 2 September 2010. Quotation: ’[A]ny one who assists in the commission of a crime may be charged directly with the commission of the crime’.
*^Text taken from ’Criminal Resource Manual 2472’. US Justice Department. January 1998., a work of the US Federal Government. It cites United States v. Peoni, 100 F.2d 401, 402 (2d Cir. 1938).
*^US Justice Department (1998), citing United States v. Dodd, 43 F.3d 759, 763 (1st Cir. 1995).
*^US Justice Department (1998)
*^http://trucounsel.com/index.php/aiding-and-abetting, accessed September 15, 2011.Retrieved from ’https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aiding_and_abetting&oldid=1000446067’
Register here: http://gg.gg/opv75
https://diarynote.indered.space
Sep 04, 2014 Common futures bets include betting a team to win a championship at the outset of a season, or betting whether the team will win or lose more games than a set line at the start of the season. Abet definition, to encourage, support, or countenance by aid or approval, usually in wrongdoing: to abet a swindler; to abet a crime. Abet (ə-bĕt′) tr.v. Abetted, abetting, abets 1. To approve, encourage, and support (an action or a plan of action); urge and help on. To urge, encourage, or help (a person): abetted the thief in robbing the. Jul 15, 2020 How to Bet on Sports for Beginners: 12 Tips to Know 1. Underdogs When the oddsmakers release a betting line on a game, the first thing they do is decide which. Spreads There are two main ways to bet on a favorite or an underdog. The first is the point spread, which is a bet on. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.
In the world of sports betting, a money line bet is simply betting on which team you expect to win. It doesn’t have anything to do with a spread. You may also see a money line bet listed as “Money Line” or “ML” in different spaces.
Money lines are represented in negative and positive values.Negative money line: -145, -220, or anything similar
When you see a minus (-) sign in front of a price, it shows you that team is the favorite to win the game.
That number also indicates how much money you need to bet/spend in order to win $100.
For example, a -220 money line means you need to bet $220 in order to win $100 provided the team you bet on actually does win.
Heavy favorites are known in sports betting as a “chalk” pick. A heavy favorite usually has a number pushing +300 or more. Here, you’re wagering a lot on the favorite to win a little. Don’t assume that a heavy favorite, or chalk pick, is a guaranteed winner…Positive money line: +145, +220, or anything similar
When you see a plus (+) sign in front of a price, it shows you that team is the underdog. Higher numbers like +400, +500, +5000, etc. represent how much of an underdog the team is in the game. The higher the number the more likely the team is expected to lose in the eyes of the oddsmakers.
The number also indicates how much money would win in comparison to every $100 you wager.If I Were A Betting Man
For example, a +150 money line means you would win $150 for each $100 wager you place should that team win the game.Money line examples:
Lets use an NFL example here:
New England Patriots -240
Miami Dolphins +220
To bet the New England Patriots to win on the money line, you would need to spend $240 on the bet for a chance to win $100 if the Patriots beat the Dolphins. Your return would be $340 – the original $240 stake (bet) and the $100 bet profit.
To bet the Miami Dolphins to win on the money line, you would spend $100 on the bet for a chance to win $220 if the Dolphins, as the underdog, beat the Patriots. Your return would be $320 – the original $100 stake (bet) and the $220 profit.
In both situations, it doesn’t matter if the team you bet on wins by one point or 100 points. You’re purely betting on the team you believe will win the game. As Al Davis said, “Just win, baby.” That’s exactly what you’d be looking for out of your selection. It doesn’t have to be pretty, it just has to happen or your original stake is lost.
Aiding and abetting is a legal doctrine related to the guilt of someone who aids or abets (encourages, incites) another person in the commission of a crime (or in another’s suicide). It exists in a number of different countries and generally allows a court to pronounce someone guilty for aiding and abetting in a crime even if they are not the principal offender.Canada[edit]
In Canada, a person who aids or abets in the commission of a crime is treated the same as a principal offender under the criminal law. Section 21(1) of the Criminal Code provides that:Every one is a party to an offence who(a) actually commits it;(b) does or omits to do anything for the purpose of aiding any person to commit it; or(c) abets any person in committing it.[1]A Betting Person
To show that an accused aided or abetted in the commission of a crime, the Crown does not need to prove the guilt of a specific principal offender.
The Crown must show something more than mere presence to prove the act of aiding or abetting. Presence in the commission of a crime might be evidence of aiding and abetting if the accused had prior knowledge of the crime, or if the accused had legal duty or control over the principal offender. For example, the owner of a car who lets another person drive dangerously without taking steps to prevent it may be guilty because of their control over the driver’s use of the vehicle.[2]
Further, the Crown must show that the accused had prior knowledge that ’an offence of the type committed was planned’, but it is not necessary that the accused desired the result or had the motive of assisting the crime. Intention to assist the crime is sufficient.[3]United States[edit]Criminal[edit]
Aiding and abetting is an additional provision in United Statescriminal law, for situations where it cannot be shown the party personally carried out the criminal offense, but where another person may have carried out the illegal act(s) as an agent of the charged, working together with or under the direction of the charged, who is an accessory to the crime. It is comparable to laws in some other countries governing the actions of accessories, including the similar provision in England and Wales under the Accessories and Abettors Act 1861.A Betting Woman
It is derived from the United States Code (U.S.C.), section two of title 18:
(a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal.(b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal.
The scope of this federal statute for aiders and abettors ’is incredibly broad—it can be implied in every charge for a federalsubstantive offense.’ [4] Where the term ’principal’ refers to any actor who is primarily responsible for a criminal offense.
For a successful prosecution, the provision of ’aiding and abetting’ must be considered alongside the crime itself, although a defendant can be found guilty of aiding and abetting an offense even if the principal is found not guilty of the crime itself. In all cases of aiding and abetting, it must be shown a crime has been committed, but not necessarily who committed it.[5] It is necessary to show that the defendant has wilfully associated himself with the crime being committed, that he does, through his own act or omission, as he would do if he wished for a criminal venture to succeed.[6] Under this statute, anyone who aids or abets a crime may be charged directly with the crime, as if the charged had carried out the act himself.[7] This is distinct from the concept of being an accessory after the fact, a charge distinct from being a principal.A Betting System CrosswordHistory[edit]
The first United States statute dealing with accessory liability was passed in 1790, and made criminally liable those who should aid and assist, procure, command, counsel or advise murder or robbery on land or sea, or piracy at sea. This was broadened in 1870 to include any felony, and by it an accessory was anyone who counsels, advises or procures the crime. These early statutes were repealed in 1909, and supplanted by 18 U.S.C. § 550, a statute which included the modern language of ’Whoever aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces, or procures the commission of an offense is a principal.’[8]Start A Betting Site
In 1948, § 550 became 18 U.S.C. § 2(a). Section 2(b) was also added to make clear the legislative intent to punish as a principal not only one who directly commits an offense and one who ’aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures’ another to commit an offense, but also anyone who causes the doing of an act which if done by him directly would render him guilty of an offense against the United States. It removes all doubt that one who puts in motion or assists in the illegal enterprise or causes the commission of an indispensable element of the offense by an innocent agent or instrumentality is guilty as a principal even though he intentionally refrained from the direct act constituting the completed offense.[9]
Subsection (a) of Section 2 was amended to its current form in 1951 to read, ’Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal.’ Subsection (b) was also amended in 1951 to add ’wilfully’ and ’is punishable as a principal.’[10]Application to ’white collar crimes’[edit]
Since 2001, the Securities and Exchange Commission has filed a number of complaints related to the aiding and abetting of securities fraud. For example, CIBC and Merrill Lynch were separately charged with aiding and abetting Enron’s evasion of record keeping requirements and required financial controls. Settlements, including disgorgement, penalties, and interest reached $80 million in both cases.Civil[edit]
Aiding and abetting is also a legal theory of civil accessory liability. To prove accessory liability through ’aiding and abetting,’ the plaintiffs must prove three elements:
*That Defendant B breached a duty to Plaintiff, the result of which injured Plaintiff;
*That Defendant A knowingly and substantially assisted Defendant B in breaching the duty; and
*That Defendant A was aware of its role in promoting the breach of duty at the time it provided assistance.[11]United Kingdom[edit]
The Accessories and Abettors Act 1861 provides that an accessory to an indictable offence shall be treated in the same way as if he had actually committed the offence himself. Section 8 of the Act, as amended, reads:
Whosoever shall aid, abet, counsel, or procure the commission of any indictable offence, whether the same be an offence at common law or by virtue of any Act passed or to be passed, shall be liable to be tried, indicted, and punished as a principal offender.
Section 10 states that the Act does not apply to Scotland. The rest of the Act was repealed by the Criminal Law Act 1967 as a consequence of the abolition of the distinction between felonies and misdemeanours.See also[edit]Reading A Betting LineLook up aid and abet in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.References[edit]A Betting Man Is A Meme
*^Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c C-46, s 21.
*^R. v. Kulbacki, [1966] 1 CCC 167 (Man CA)
*^R. v. Hibbert, [1995] 2 SCR 973
*^Benton Martin, Jeremiah Newhall, Technology and the Guilty Mind: When Do Technology Providers Become Criminal Accomplices?
*^Stephanie Wickouski (2007). Bankruptcy Crimes Third Edition. p. 95. ISBN978-1-58798-272-9.
*^American Bar Association Antitrust Section (1982). Jury instructions in criminal antitrust cases. p. 27. ISBN9780897070546.
*^’United States v. Hodorowicz – 105 F.2d 218 (1939)’. US Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. June 13, 1939. Retrieved 2 September 2010. Quotation: ’[A]ny one who assists in the commission of a crime may be charged directly with the commission of the crime’.
*^Text taken from ’Criminal Resource Manual 2472’. US Justice Department. January 1998., a work of the US Federal Government. It cites United States v. Peoni, 100 F.2d 401, 402 (2d Cir. 1938).
*^US Justice Department (1998), citing United States v. Dodd, 43 F.3d 759, 763 (1st Cir. 1995).
*^US Justice Department (1998)
*^http://trucounsel.com/index.php/aiding-and-abetting, accessed September 15, 2011.Retrieved from ’https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aiding_and_abetting&oldid=1000446067’
Register here: http://gg.gg/opv75
https://diarynote.indered.space
コメント